Issues related to men, their problems and relationships

men problems, men relationships, men and relationships, men and women relationships, relationship advice for men, men relationship advice, men to men relationship

Archive for January, 2011

(rev 2.1) What part of 'Death to America' DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND!? {HRI 20080927-V2.1}

What part of ‘Death to America’ DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND!?

                                                   27 September 2008
                                                  {HRI 20080927-V2.1}

                                                        (Version 2.1
                                                also on 27 Sept 2008)

                                                       (view Summary
                                                         by skipping

I told you, that ‘Energy precedes action’

      – words, intentions, emotions (which are Energies) precede and
        cause actions.

Thus, in order to prevent (destructive future) actions, you have
 to face the intentions and emotions and words or ideas, and their

      that are destructive, and that intend destruction:

 A person does not pull the trigger of a rifle to kill you, unless he
 or she FIRST has the intention, the emotion or the "logical" words or
 ideas, to do so.

      So this gives you the basic action of your defense against

           ’Zero Tolerance for Evil Impulses’

                  – which any caring policeman knows to be the major
                    tool of his trade.

I gave you the various other Human Rights Issues, for the same reason:
 so that you actually start to defend yourself and others,

            against Evil,

      for which you have to have some vague understanding of life
      itself, an understanding of Evil individuals also,

      your own, native understanding of life,

            which everyone has taken away from you, and

      which I am restoring to you

            – because I can – I have the necessary Love and Beauty and
            Energy to hold Truth, to do so restore it to you.

Criminal Minds DEMAND, that you cooperate with them.

      Not only highjackers, hostage-takers and terrorists do DEMAND
      – rather violently – that you in some way "cooperate" with them,

      but ALSO Criminal heads of state, do demand and try the same,
      with similar acts of blackmail or extortion:

                 "If you do not cooperate with the Kreminals,* then
                  we – Putin and ‘KGB’ – will be even MORE nasty and
                  evil to you," *(Kreminals = Kremlin plus Criminals)

                       "well, we will not be nasty to ‘Le Rat’ Sarkozy
                        of course, because he protects and hides our
                        evil and our actual intentions to dominate or
                        destroy you, but"

                 "we will be even more nasty and evil to others."

                       ’Le Rat’ Sarkozy does NOT demand, that Putin is
                        punished for utterly destructive lying about
                        Georgia, nor for years of active subversion
                        inside Georgia, and for inflicting billions of
                        dollars of damage inside Georgia,

                              out of entirely malicious and wholly
                              destructive motives.

                        But ‘Le Rat’ Sarkozy DOES demand, that those
                        who ‘over-loaned’ the housing market in
                        America and elsewhere

                              which is a common practice,

                              counting, amongst other things, on an
                              expanding economy, one

                              that is NOT ruined by violent sociopaths
                              like Putin

                                    – since May 2008, he, Putin and
                                      his ‘KGB’ friends,

                                          who thought they could
                                          ‘shape’ any "truth" to
                                          their devious goals,

                                      made the Russian stockmarket
                                      lose 500 BILLION USD or such,

                                    so that nobody wants to invest in
                                    Russia anymore,

                                          except ‘Le Rat’ Sarkozy,
                                          and Total SA, etc. buying up
                                          oil and aircraft shares,

                       ’Le Rat’ Sarkozy does NOT demand, that Putin is
                        punished for utterly destructive lying (to
                        "justify" his evil acts) about Georgia,

                        and is punished for years of active military
                        subversion and ethnic "cleansing" in Georgia,

                              called "peace keeping" by Putin,

                        and is punished for inflicting billions of
                        dollars of damage onto Georgia’s trade,

                        and is punished for recently, by military
                        force, INVADING Georgia and deliberately and
                        with very false and malicious lies,

                        inflicting billions of dollars of damage
                        on Georgia’s infrastructure, as well as for
                        murdering people during that assault.

                              Due and fair punishment for that, ‘Le
                              Rat’ Sarkozy does NOT demand, but
                              instead, he hides and even refuses to
                              mention the Criminality and Sociopathy
                              of Putin,

                                    and to mention Putin’s intentions
                                    to further undermine and destroy
                                    the free world,

                                          including, eventually,
                                          Putin destroying ‘Le Rat’
                                          Sarkozy himself,

                                          as is the unavoidable fate
                                          of all ‘Mafia brides’ and
                                          similarly treacherous

         In the United Nations Organizations, the sociopathic heads
         of state claim to have the legal right – and they demand –
         that "you must cooperate with them," and treat them as

         you must accept their arguments as ‘genuine’ and ‘as if they
         really mean what they say’ by their intensely evil lies:

           "Jerusalem is a Holy City – therefore Israel must be
            destroyed" – they just find some idea, any idea, by which
            they hope, they can get some people to inflict evil.

        "Evil must not be stopped, but cooperated with:"

           "America is a country of free people – this is intolerable,
            they must be brought to submission – everyone must be
            brought to submission."

                  So they – being Criminal Minds – want to have
                  everything seen IN REVERSE,

                  and they "accuse" America of what THEY themselves do
                  and want all the time: Submission and domination.

                 "America is ‘Dominating,’ America is ‘Occupying’."

                        It is what THEY, the Criminal Minds, want and

                  I have probably to tell you this a hundred times,
                  before it trickles through the webs of lies that
                  Criminal Minds have spun around your soul:

                        Criminal Minds want you to see and feel
                        everything IN REVERSE, as the opposite of
                        what it actually is.

Russia’s Putin, and Iran’s Khamenei and Ahmadinejad WANT Iran to make
 and use Atom bombs. I think it was then still Russian Defense
 Minister Sergei Ivanov or a colleague – as reported in the press –
 who stated, that ‘The West should get used to the fact that Iran will
 have an Atom bomb,’ and that they (the West) can protest whatever it
 wants, to no avail.

Putin etc. want it now, they wanted it for many years, and they will
 want it as long as they live and beyond:

      To make as much trouble as possible without being stopped, and
      to inflict as much damage as they can without being stopped.

      They only CAN achieve that in their own, current society, and
      also globally, BY LYING ABOUT IT.

Russia’s Putin, and Iran’s Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, and their friends

      to more easily dominate it, and so they want to do it WHILE

They want Evil to triumph, to last forever, for Criminals to have a
 ’Safe Haven’ on Earth, where they can be as Evil as they please

      – as also they do know very well, that everyone is a soul, to be
        born again and again on Earth – WHICH Criminal Minds ALSO have
        made you deny…

      THEY want Evil, Ugliness and Domination and Destruction, to

      They wanted that – since forever, you could say, practically
      speaking – and they will want it forever, because that is the
      nature of their soul.

            This is not at all the goal of the people of the Russian
            Navy nor of the Russian Air Force – but these are not
            given an opportunity to disobey their being forced to
            associate with Criminals that Putin wants to support,
            such as the heads of state of Venezuela or Syria.

Russia’s Putin, and Iran’s Khamenei and Ahmadinejad are ENTIRELY
 INSANE, but

 other Criminal Minds have so perverted the definitions of Sane and
 Insane, that

      you can not act anymore, except, well… Insanely:

Asking Putin to help stop Iran from making and launching Atom bombs,
 is the same as asking Ahmadinejad and Khamenei to stop making Atom

Yet, at the very moment, yesterday, when Putin thought you realized
 that he, Putin, IS an Enemy and that he, Putin, IS entirely Insane
 and malicious

      – and he withdrew from the talks about Iran, he, Putin knowing
        well that HE, Putin, wants Iran to make Atom bombs, but that
        this should not be known –

      at the very moment that he thought you had found out about him,
      and he thus withdrew,

 YOU GO INSANE AGAIN, with your craving for approval from or your
 insane craving for at least cooperation with, the most violent and
 vicious and PROVEN of Criminal Minds: Russia’s Putin.

You are so nauseatingly and so DESTRUCTIVELY INSANE.

I wrote earlier on the matter:

By far, far, far the cheapest way to handle Iran’s Atom Bomb throwers

                                                          6 Aug 2008
                                           {HRI note 20080806-V1.0.3}

                                                      (Version 1.0.3
                                                       on 8 Aug 2008)

Evil is caused by individuals.

The source of Evil that intends to build AND fire the Atom Bomb, from

     "to have Iran’s Islamic God start the ‘Day of Judgment’ promised
      by the prophetic Mohamed, and

     ’To Return Peace and Happiness to all "Islamic" people, by
      dominating the "enemies",’

      by dominating, or else exterminating, those people who refuse
      to submit to Mullah (excuse me, that is ‘not said’ – it is of
      course) to Allah, who ‘talks through an Islamic Mullah’,"

that source of Evil has been sufficiently recognized, in Iran, as
being the entirely Insane Ahmadinejad, and the entirely Evil Khamenei.

If those sources of Evil are removed, removed from a position of
authority, then the Evil – which is intended relentlessly by Iran –
will cease INSTANTLY.  *(a)

So if you have to use military force – which it appears, to everyone
involved, is required now – then you would of course STRIKE AT THE
SOURCE OF THE EVIL; which is, by military force, to remove Iran’s
Ahmadinejad and Khamenei.

      That is: To strike at those who WANT at any cost an Atom bomb
      and to USE it "to deliver God’s judgment on Earth," "so as to
      establish ‘God’s – no doubt Islamic – kingdom on Earth, where
      all people are either happy, or destroyed by God’."

      They confuse Criminal Minds, and Demonic creatures, those who
      DID and do destroy people, with ‘God.’ (see references)

            This is common in various "religions" in which some Evil
            individual pretended to be God, as a person, and so, "God"
            is then endowed with rage and wrath and revenge, and is
            demanding all kind of – very UN-GODLY – evil,

            evil which is indeed not at all from God (if defined
            correctly – see references) but it is

            evil from Demonic creatures, from Criminal Minds, who may
            pretend or claim anything, including ‘being God.’

                  This I had to explain for you, elsewhere in more
                  detail, because nobody else did. (see references)

You would of course STRIKE AT THE SOURCE OF THE EVIL, which means – by
military force of stealth – to remove Iran’s Ahmadinejad and Khamenei,
removing these according to the First International Law,

      when the people of Iran continuously and very obviously failed
      to do so themselves, despite orders to that effect.  *(1)

Nowadays, that is an extremely simple operation.

      If you already can penetrate Syria and take out an Atomic plant
      under construction, despite Syria’s defenses, then you sure
      are capable of something.

      Or if you can snipe at and kill some major nuclear terrorist who
      in Syria is ‘the highest military guy’ for cooperation with
      Iran in that matter, then you sure can do something.

      Isn’t it…

So, by military stealth, removing Ahmadinejad and Khamenei

      – who would have been removed instantly anyway and without
        the loss of their life, according to The First International
        Law – removing the SOURCES OF EVIL,

            those who intend to fire one or more Atom bombs within
            the framework of their extremely sick minds or "religion,"

      removing the SOURCES OF EVIL, who intend to fire Atom Bombs
      and make themselves and others go to their Islamic hell (excuse
      me) what they are told is Mohamed’s "Heaven," but they will,
      whatever they do, go to Hell anyway, due to the irreparable
      nature of their sociopathic soul, which you can understand if
      you define these things correctly (which I did elsewhere, see
      references, below)

by military stealth, removing Ahmadinejad and Khamenei,

Iranian military installations and also its nuclear facilities.

Every even vaguely sane and caring person, will be greatly relieved
by the elimination of that threat to our security, and also with the
meeting out of just punishment as the current situation requires it.

For the environment, it is INFINITELY more protective, and INFINITELY
cheaper, to remove Ahmadinejad and Khamenei – who would have been
removed instantly anyway, according to The First International Law,
then possibly without them losing their life, but still to remove them
– to instantly remove the SOURCES OF EVIL.

This does not require great intelligence to understand, but it
requires some feeling of care for people, and some ability to
understand the INTENTIONS of sociopaths (Ahmadinejad and Khamenei),

      understanding these and so caring for all the people in the
      area who do not,

      no matter how Insane the Arab-Muslim population has been made
      throughout the ages of refusing to see Criminal Minds who are
      "governing" them,

 your care and understanding combine into the INSISTENCE to follow
 through (which rhymes with Mogadishu, a town in Somalia, which has an
 airport, at Entebbe, that got world famous in 1976).  *(b)

Koos Nolst Trenite ‘Cause Trinity’
human rights philosopher and poet

                                            ‘Men of all nations came
                                       to listen to Solomon’s wisdom,
                                  sent by all the kings of the world,
                                         who had heard of his wisdom.’

                                                        1 Kings 4:34

(a)   I could not get that across to American president ‘FDR’
      Roosevelt, in my previous life time, to acquire the American
      assistance in removing Hitler; no, ‘the German army’ (which by
      then comprised in reality almost the whole working population
      of Germany "defending itself" but not against its government,
      not against Hitler), in fact the whole working population of
      Germany, had to be exterminated because ‘FDR’ Roosevelt, the
      World War Two president of America, was a sociopath, a very
      destructive, mean and treacherous person, who dominated and
      blackmailed England’s prime minister, Churchill, and who kept
      Russia’s entirely Insane dictator Stalin in power; and thus he,
      ‘FDR’ Roosevelt, refused to prevent the ensuing ‘Cold War,’ at
      tremendous expense and inflicted suffering, not only to (the
      people of) Europe but also to (the people of) America.

      This I have described elsewhere for you.

(b)  ’The simple fact is, that no one expected, that Israel would take
      such a risk, and this is why the operation was successful – the
      element of surprise belonged to Israel.’

     ’On July 4, 1976, Operation Thunderbolt went into action. In a
      lighting attack, the terrorists were killed and the hostages
      freed. The total operation took less than 58 minutes to execute
      with only two fatalities. Sadly, operation leader Lt. Col.
      Yonathan Netanyahu (brother of Prime Minister Benjamin
      Netanyahu) was killed in the raid and a Jewish hostage, who had
      been taken to a Ugandan hospital prior to the rescue, was

     ’This mission made an aggressive statement towards international
      terrorism. As [the general who was in charge of the operation,
      general] Shomron, was quoted, after the operation:

     "It resonated far and wide… It showed, that you could counter
      terrorism, and that it is worth cooperating, to do so."

     [So it happened, that] eight days after the hostages were taken,
      they were rescued by the Israeli Defense Forces, in one of the
      most heroic military missions to save citizens, in the 20th
      century. [On the 4th of July, the day on which] the United
      States was celebrating its freedom and democracy, Israel was
      acting at that same exact time, to protect the freedom of
      its people.’


(1)  ’First International Law on Islamic countries –
      Fatwa (Islamic Decision) on some known Islamic demons:
      Saddam Hussein, Khomeini, Yasser Arafat, Khamenei,
      Bashar al-Assad, Ahmadinejad, Muqtada al-Sadr,
      Manouchehr Mottaki, Nasrallah, Haniyeh, Gaddafi,
      Omar al-Bashir, Mahathir Mohamad’
      {HRI 20070223-V3.0.1} (Version 3.0 on 4 Apr 2008)
       (23 February 2007 – Version 3.0.1 on 12 June 2008)
       (Version 3.0.1 was also posted as Version 3.0, on 12 June)


     ’Defining God correctly – and Heaven, and Hell – What is
      Monotheism’  (DGC)
      {HRI 20080406-V4.6.1}
       (6 April 2008 – Version 4.6.1 on 1 June 2008)

     ’Three Anecdotes about Koos Nolst Trenite – Intending others
      to be decent to each other – What is ‘Zero Tolerance’ actually’
      {HRI 20060305-V2.3}  (ZTA)
       (5 March 2006 – Issued 7 Dec 2007 – Version 2.3 on 30 May 2008)

     ’Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Vital
      {HRI 20020819-V2.2.3}
       (19 August 2002 – Version 2.2.3 on 12 May 2005)

     ’Criminal Minds Hide From You, That They ENJOY LYING, AND That
      THEY Know Very Well They Intentionally Lie To You’
      – (incl. Textnote d. on ‘Criminal Minds want Admiration
                               in order to feel good’)
      {HRI 20050527-V3.7.1}
       (27 May 2005 – Version 3.7.1 on 7 June 2007)

     ’Criminal Minds KNOW VERY WELL, Who Tells The Truth’
      {HRI 20060427-V1.1} – adds to {HRI 20050527-V3.5} *(3)
       (27 April 2006 – Version 1.1 on 29 April 2006)

     ’Detecting a Criminal Mind, by ‘What does he (or she) NOT talk
      about, NOT look at, NOT do?’
      {HRI 20080725-V2.1}
       (25 July 2008 – Version 2.1 on 6 Aug 2008)

     ’Definition of Peace’  (DOP)
      {HRI 20070520-V3.3}
       (20 May 2007 – Version 3.3 on 22 Apr 2008)

     ’Criminal Minds prevent you from knowing the Nature of War –
      Quote from ‘The Nature Of War’ {HRI 20051027-V1.6}’
       (7 November 2005 – Quote Version 1.0.2 on 14 Dec 2006)

     ’The Nature of War’  (NOW)
      {HRI 20051027-V1.8.1}
       (27 Oct 2005 – Version 1.8.1 on 4 May 2007)

     ’Definition of Perception – Protecting against the Criminal Mind
      – Fine Particle Physics on the main Poisonous Life Energy
      {FPP-HRI 20080608-V3.4}
        (8 June 2008 – Version 3.4 on 24 June 2008)

     ’Explaining the First International Law (FIL)’
      {HRI 20070531-V1.3}
       (31 May 2007 – Version 1.3 on 1 June 2007)

     ’The First International Law’ (FIL)
      {HRI 20021124-V2.0.2}
       (24 November 2002 – Version 2.0.2 on 10 Aug 2007)

     ’The Rights of Criminal Minds’  (RCM)
      {HRI 20040108-V1.3}
       (8 January 2004 – Version 1.3 on 26 Jun 2008)

     ’Defining ‘Destructive Coward’ – Part Twelve: ‘Makes Criminal
      Minds seen as "normal" – Medical "science," "research" and
      "charity"’ ‘
      {HRI 20050610-V3.2.3-pi12-V2.0.1}
       (30 November 2007 – Version 2.0.1 on 3 Dec 2007)

     ’Definition of Justice’  (DOJ)
      {HRI 20070817-V2.1.1}
       (17 August 2007 – Version 2.1.1 on 9 July 2008)

     ’ ‘The Shadow Of A Monster,’ being the body-double of Saddam
      Hussein’s son Uday – Report on Saddam Hussein’s criminal
      {HRI 20060702-A2-V1.0.1}
       (2 July 2006 – Issued separately 28 Dec 2006 – Version 1.0.1)
      {HRI 20060702-A2-V1.0.2} (V1.0.2 has a short intro message)
       (2 July 2006 – Issued separately 28 Dec 2006 – Version 1.0.2)

     ’Obviously the Second Law Of Human Rights’  (SLOHR)
      {HRI 20060924-V3.2.1}
       (24 September 2006 – Version 3.2.1 on 6 Aug 2007)

     ’The Anti-Normal’
      {HRI 20071208-V1.0}
       (8 December 2007)



Copyright 2008 by Koos Nolst Trenite – human rights philosopher
 and poet
This is ‘learnware’ – it may not be altered, and it is free for
 anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
 who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
 to others who might be able to learn from it (but not to sociopaths,
 who vehemently oppose any true knowledge of life and of themselves).
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
 or religious or scientific ‘agenda,’ but only to educate, and to
 encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
 about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
 PlatoWorld at

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (3)

The Kathleen Parker Problem

"A mom wants to wring her 10-year-old son’s neck when he tracks mud
through her freshly mopped kitchen. When a grown woman finds out her
husband has become intimate with the help, she wants to invite Lorena
Bobbitt to din-din and forget to put the cleaver in the dishwasher."

The above citation is from a Kathleen Parker column of a little over 5
years ago.

It’s the only thing that Kathleen Parker has ever written or said that
I am capable of remembering or will ever be capable of remembering.

Nothing else that Kathleen Parker has ever said or written in the past
or that she will ever say or write in the future can possibly matter.

On Sep 27, 1:19 pm, Jill <perspicaci…> wrote:

- — -


> The Palin Problem
> Kathleen Parker
> Friday, September 26, 2008

> WASHINGTON — If at one time women were considered heretical for
> swimming upstream against feminist orthodoxy, they now face
> condemnation for swimming downstream — away from Sarah Palin.

> To express reservations about her qualifications to be vice president
> — and possibly president — is to risk being labeled anti-woman.

> Or, as I am guilty of charging her early critics, supporting only a
> certain kind of woman.

> Some of the passionately feminist critics of Palin who attacked her
> personally deserved some of the backlash they received. But
> circumstances have changed since Palin was introduced as just a hockey
> mom with lipstick — what a difference a financial crisis makes — and
> a more complicated picture has emerged.

> As we’ve seen and heard more from John McCain’s running mate, it is
> increasingly clear that Palin is a problem. Quick study or not, she
> doesn’t know enough about economics and foreign policy to make
> Americans comfortable with a President Palin should conditions warrant
> her promotion.

> Yes, she recently met and turned several heads of state as the United
> Nations General Assembly convened in New York. She was gracious,
> charming and disarming. Men swooned. Pakistan’s president wanted to
> hug her. (Perhaps Osama bin Laden is dying to meet her?)

> And, yes, she has common sense, something we value. And she’s had
> executive experience as a mayor and a governor, though of relatively
> small constituencies (about 6,000 and 680,000, respectively).

> Finally, Palin’s narrative is fun, inspiring and all-American in that
> frontier way we seem to admire. When Palin first emerged as John
> McCain’s running mate, I confess I was delighted. She was the
> antithesis and nemesis of the hirsute, Birkenstock-wearing sisterhood
> — a refreshing feminist of a different order who personified the
> modern successful working mother.

> Palin didn’t make a mess cracking the glass ceiling. She simply glided
> through it.

> It was fun while it lasted.

> Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity and now
> Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident
> candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

> No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been
> pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform
> brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the
> held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute
> button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My
> cringe reflex is exhausted.

> Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut
> the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one
> example of many from her interview with Hannity:

> "Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to
> get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s
> something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can
> work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that
> must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this."

> When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had
> boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: "I’m not looking at
> poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going
> to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt
> to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions
> for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?"

> If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

> If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time
> Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because
> she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential
> ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.

> What to do?

> McCain can’t repudiate his choice for running mate. He not only risks
> the wrath of the GOP’s unforgiving base, but he invites others to
> second-guess his executive decision-making ability. Barack Obama faces
> the same problem with Biden.

> Only Palin can save McCain, her party and the country she loves. She
> can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend
> more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts
> her family first.

> Do it for your country.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)

Is Dan Sullivan gay or what?

Why were you investigated by CPS 15 times, Dan?

You told a story about how you saw the
name and phone number of one of the
other abuse reporters (apparently NOT
all your bipolar ex wife) but when asked
questions about that reporter you avoided them.

I have asked you many times what it is
about you that would make you such a
lightning rod for 15+ child abuse reports.

You lied and pretended it was all the
result of one bipolar ex, but were forced
to acknowledge that the VOLUME of
abuse reports were NOT from her or
people she enlisted.

Anybody can figure out that there is
something about you that would attract
15 child abuse reports and not all from
the nut case ex-wife.

Making SEVERAL babies with a freakin’
mental case like that certainly should
make people wonder about you as well, Dan.

Wouldn’t marrying and making several
babies with a woman you KNEW was
a freakin’ nut job make you some kind
of bottom feeder, Dan Sullivan?

Later you tried to blame all of the 15
child abuse reports on the one mental
case ex-wife, but that’s not so.

What IS is about you Dan, that attracted
FIFTEEN child abuse reports on you?

Are you gay?
Drag queen?
Do you just "look like a perv" or what?
Apparently some people thought so.
Even some caseworkers.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (50)

Net Casting by Google…
  2Barter, Google & YouTube
Search Author <auth…>
Craig Oral Somerford

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (2)

Video Shows Feminists Attacking Pro-Lifers in front of Argentinean Cathedral

‘Feminists’, in this case, is a nice way of saying ‘dykes’.

Video Shows Feminists Attacking Pro-Lifers in front of Argentinean Cathedral

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

NEUQUÉN, ARGENTINA, September 24, 2008 (LifeSiteNews)– Argentinean
feminists participating in a the annual National Women’s Encounter viciously
attacked pro-life protesters in the city of Neuquen, who stood in front of
the Cathedral to protect it from desecration, according to the catholic news
agency ACI Prensa, which posted a video of the events on YouTube

Repeating last years assault on the cathedral in Cordoba
(, where they held
their previous meeting, the feminists are shown spitting in the face of
pro-lifers, throwing bottles at them, taking their banner by force and
burning it, and hurling anti-Catholic insults.

The pro-lifers are seen standing in a line in front of the cathedral with
their arms locked, beneath a poster showing a child killed by abortion, and
praying the rosary.

Last year’s National Women’s Encounter resulted in a similar disturbance in
front of the cathedral in Cordoba, where meeting participants exploded in a
frenzy of obscenity and violence as they marched by pro-lifers, who stood
beneath a sign that said "Cordoba Defends Life".  They exposed their
genitals and threw paint at the cathedral, and attacked at least one girl,
whom the police refused to help.  Meeting participants also reportedly
attacked other participants who refused to take a pro-abortion position

J Young
Owner of Eric F Berg aka ‘LC’

* here’s the entire collection of efber…

Obama/Biden ’08

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (7)

Births outside marriage – a real cause for concern…

Unless trends change, in just eight years time most babies in Britain will
be born outside marriage.

Already the majority of newborns in Wales (52%) and the North East of
England (55%)are delivered to parents who are not married. Nationally, the
figure for 2007 is 44.3%, having risen from just 8% in 1971 (data can be
downloaded here).

If the rate of increase remains as it has been since 2000, my maths shows
that by 2016 more than 50% of UK babies will be born outside wedlock—

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (2)

Gordon Brown's society is anything but equal…

Gordon Brown wants "fairness" to be the battleground of the next general
election. This at least is clear from a fin-de-siècle-style Labour
conference last week which saw MPs and delegates swinging hourly from
euphoria to despair to plotting and back again. In his speech, the Prime
Minister tried valiantly to turn the current financial crisis to political
advantage. Only Labour, he suggested, genuinely wanted and could, in fact,
deliver a fairer Britain. Only Labour really believed in transparency,
responsibility, integrity. Only Labour was on the side of pensioners… the
poor… children… hard-working families… the people.

The truth is that Labour’s credentials on fairness are far worse than they
would like us to believe. The UK now has the greatest gap in life expectancy
between rich and poor of any developed country. According to the Institute
for Fiscal Studies, there are 900,000 more people living in severe poverty
now than in 1997. And there are 2.5 million pensioners living in poverty
now; 100,000 more than in 1997. These groups include some of the most
vulnerable people in Britain. So much for Gordon being on their side.

This is fairness as redistribution. What about fairness between generations?
Well, Gordon has spent £1.2 trillion over and above the 1997 level in the
decade since then. After a 15-year boom we should have a budget surplus. But
in fact we have a 3 per cent budget deficit: the highest in the industrial
world after Pakistan, Egypt and Hungary. And that does not even include the
£100bn of PFI debt which Mr Brown has hidden off the national balance sheet.
But today’s debt is tomorrow’s taxes – not an enticing prospect for young
people now who increasingly believe, rightly, that Mr Brown has picked their

Of course, we do not need to be bound simply by the Prime Minister’s narrow
and idiosyncratic ideas of fairness. We can ask, where is the fairness to
taxpayers of losing £2.7bn a year in benefit fraud and error? Where is the
fairness to rural communities of closing thriving local Post Offices? Where
is the fairness to soldiers who have to endure "disgraceful" housing?
Enough. The real argument on fairness between Labour and the Conservatives
is not so much about ends as about means. And the ugly fact of the matter
for Mr Brown is that the state, far from always enabling progressive social
goals, has often undermined them.

The UK now has an incredibly complex benefits system; a savings system that
often deters saving; police forces that face upwards to their political
masters; schools that have more new buildings but less freedom to teach; a
criminal justice system that offers less support to victims; and an NHS that
is struggling to raise its performance in the knowledge that weakening
productivity means fewer operations, more sickness and earlier death.
Meanwhile, 3.8 million more have been brought into the tax system, 2.7
million of them among the less well-off, and the poorest fifth of the
population pays a higher percentage of its income in tax than the richest.
What is progressive about all this?

If we are to have better public services and a better society, we need to
rethink the shape and purpose of the state itself. And, however sincere Mr
Brown may believe himself to be, this can never take place while he is Prime
Minister. As Einstein remarked, we cannot solve problems with the same kind
of thinking we used to create them.

Since 2005, the Conservatives have been deeply engaged in this process of
rethinking, and have placed the ideas of fraternity and social
responsibility at the heart of British politics. This has required the
creation of a new political viewpoint. We now need to do the same for

In Compassionate Economics, I suggest that this rethinking must start with
our conventional economic models. These textbook ideas have exercised a long
monopoly in the minds of our politicians, none more than Gordon Brown. And
by feeding back into society, they have pushed us towards a default picture
of human beings as merely economic agents. Within government the result is
poor policy, over-centralisation and micro-management.

These ideas have created huge suspicion at globalisation, anger at the
spread of clone towns, anxiety about loss of national identity, and public
concern at the spread of consumerism. It seems as though we are in the midst
of a culturally unsustainable corporate capitalism, yet one to which there
is no alternative. But we need something bigger – we need a new political
economy. Fifteen years after Francis Fukuyama announced in The End of
History and the Last Man that capitalism had won, we still lack a principled
intellectual basis for defining what kind of capitalism we want. That, Mr
Brown, is what we need: not cheap shots from a forgotten class war.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Ms. Sarah Sounds A Bit Like She's In Over Her Head

With any luck, Ms. Palin will be sent back to Alaska to pursue her
career of moose-skinning, and McFartster will suspend his campaign
permanently to pursue the red-state whores starring in the Sturgis

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

The person who started the Western Civilization

… was a woman.

She changed England from feudal backwater into one of the greatest
empires of all times.

So if you still think that women are stupid or evil, it is your own
reflection that you are seeing in their eyes.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)

Sarah Salvages Her Credibility on the Damn Show

Oh man, she’s a stationary target, isn’t she?…

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments